Global Warming Bigger Threat Than Coronavirus | Update
Sorry, the virus shows why there is no global action on climate change. The COVID-19 pandemic devastated daily life, caused widespread illness and death, and sent the world economy into despair. Governments have responded by taking unprecedented measures to shut down entire cities, ban sanctions and segregate countries — meteorologists hope that such ambitious policies can address global warming and understand many such existential threats.
However, this would be a misleading lesson, since most inhibitors that inhibit the effective COVID-19 response avoid climate change. Scientists warn that the effects of COVID-19 will accelerate over time, posing a threat to the lives of large numbers of people, especially the most harmful. They warn that climate change, if not with the same brutality, will be severely damaged in many ways over time. If governments and companies can take drastic measures to end the sports season, close offices, and restrict movement, surely they can take such drastic measures so that we can generate and consume energy? In fact, COVID-19 reveals three reasons why it can be so difficult to fight climate change. First, we must all spend our daily lives in dramatic ways to prevent the spread of this highly contagious disease — and often do so for the benefit of others.
In order to save our lives and keep our medical system from getting overwhelmed, the pace of disease spread must slow. By doing so, public health measures are needed, including avoiding contact with others, especially those who carry the virus without even knowing it. Many young and healthy people need to be able to cope with COVID-19, but “social hazards” are needed to help others cope with the disease, especially the elderly or those with medical conditions. If governments can take drastic action to close offices and restrict movement, can they take equally drastic measures to change how energy is generated and consumed? In other words, infection “flattening” is a classic collective action problem. Some people choose self-isolation responsibly and help others, but if most do not, there will be little benefit from that sacrifice to slow the spread of the disease.
On the other hand, if everyone separates themselves, the less risky person may opt for “free travel” over the sacrifices that life normally makes. [Mapping for coronavirus outbreaks: Get daily updates on infection and learn how. It is affecting countries around the world.] In fact, this behavior is becoming more widespread during epidemics, reducing efforts to slow the spread. Despite public health warnings, bars and restaurants in major cities such as New York are crowded, beaches in Florida are crowded, and revelers in many other parts of the world continue to ignore official directives to prevent aggregation. “If I get a corona, I get a corona,” a spring break student in Miami did illegally. Like COVID-19, climate change is a matter of ultimate collective action. Every ton of greenhouse gas contributes equally to the problem of what is produced in the world.
The United States contributes 15 percent to emissions each year; Europe, 9 percent lower. Lawmakers in Brussels have decided to impose economic costs on Europeans so that they can slow down carbon dioxide, but if others around the world do not, there will be very little benefit from the effects on the environment. The global nature of climate change means that countries need to mobilize more to address this as they want others to follow suit. While the Obama administration is developing an estimate for the harm to society caused by carbon emissions, for example, it has chosen to use the world rather than domestic estimates of the damage caused by this. Because the impact of carbon dioxide is global, and every ton of CO2 contributes equally to climate change, if all nations see just one ton of CO2 impact on their own countries, the collective response to the real damage to the atmosphere will not be enough to overcome it. Change. Unfortunately, too often the need for collective action is not a requirement for inaction. House Republicans have often argued that if China does not adhere to large emissions reductions, so should the United States.
Although public concern with climate change is growing, it has a long way to go. Only half the Americans believe that climate change is a high priority for the federal government, and that number is very low on the aisle Republican side. In fact, COVID-19 alone can destroy public support for strong climate action because of the speed of climate ambition during times of economic hardship. COVID-19 actually destroys public support for strong weather measures. , Because of the speed of atmospheric ambition. Financial crisis time. Historically, there has been an inverse relationship between public concern about the environment and concern about the economic situation in the United States and Europe. Similarly, China has often given vent to its environmental aspirations due to concerns about economic development.
Originally published at https://www.timeup.xyz.
